全ての報告
ハーツ(Hearts)の報告
#13918: "Person who comes in 2nd place SHOULD NOT receive a boost to ELO rating"
rejected: 開発者はそれは良い考えではない、あるいは費用対効果が低すぎると考えています
6
どういった内容ですか?
どうしましたか?以下から選んでください
提案:次項がゲームを大きく改善すると思われる
詳細
• 何を意味するのか、簡単に理解できるようにあなたの提案を正確かつ簡潔に説明してください。
Hearts is supposed to be played with 1 winner and 3 losers. Currently 2nd place gets an ELO boost. The game does not function properly when there is an incentive to get 2nd place.
ElO should be winner take all, and all 3 losers lose points equally.• あなたのブラウザは何ですか?
Google Chrome v78
報告履歴
tiktak292 • この提案はまだ開発者によって解析されていません:
2019年11月19日 18:00 • For Example:
If I have the opportunity to stick the queen of spades on 4th place when I am 2nd, I am currently incentivized to make this move so I can get 2nd place and conserve my ELO ranking.
If ELO was winner take all and all 3 losers lost points equally, then I would be incentivized to eat the queen of spades. This is how the game is supposed to be played
If I have the opportunity to stick the queen of spades on 4th place when I am 2nd, I am currently incentivized to make this move so I can get 2nd place and conserve my ELO ranking.
If ELO was winner take all and all 3 losers lost points equally, then I would be incentivized to eat the queen of spades. This is how the game is supposed to be played
ursaminor1 • この提案はまだ開発者によって解析されていません:
2021年 5月10日 6:18 • I disagree. In the scenario described above. The decision would be based on context. If I think I have a chance to take 1st, I'll choose one way, whereas if I think there's no chance I'll choose the way that preserves my 2nd place status. The way ELO is awarded matches the way this game is played in person: everyone would prefer to take 2nd place over 3rd or 4th, so the incentive is the same.
KingJakeoffsuit • この提案はまだ開発者によって解析されていません:
2021年 7月 7日 2:28 • The person from may 9th clearly doesn't understand the concept of the game, or the strategy. This is a huge deal, having a second place ruins a normally perfect game
pheon • この提案はまだ開発者によって解析されていません:
2022年 1月20日 11:44 • This should be implemented ASAP. There are either change the ELO award (only first will have +, all others -)
Or change the result of the game: winner is 1st and all others 2nd
Or change the result of the game: winner is 1st and all others 2nd
Just Keep Climbing • この提案はまだ開発者によって解析されていません:
2022年 7月 7日 23:35 •
2023年 6月13日 3:56 • I disagree with this suggestion. In most 3+ player games, one person is a winner, yet while the other players are not considered winners, there is still a second place, such as in Azul, Can't Stop, CATAN, 6nimmt!, Tock, Yahtzee, etc. I believe that ELO for hearts should be treated the same way as any of these other games and I ask that the devs reject this suggestion.
SleeperService • 開発者はそれは良い考えではない、あるいは費用対効果が低すぎると考えています:
2023年 7月31日 3:52 •
2023年 7月31日 14:37 • Too bad. I've played Hearts for over 65 years. There's never been a "second place". So what if these other new fangled "games" do.
報告に書き加える
このバグを再現するため、またはあなたの提案を理解するために、ここに関連性があると思われるものを追加してください:
- 他のテーブルID/行動ID
- F5キー(ページの再読込)で問題は解決されましたか?
- 問題は何回も起こりましたか?毎回 起こりますか?ランダムに起きますか?
- もしこのバグのスクリーンショットがあれば(素晴らしい!)、Imgur.com等を使ってアップロードし、リンクをコピー&ペーストしてください。