• もしあれば、画面に表示されたエラーメッセージをコピー&ペーストしてください

This is between a suggestion and a bug.

As per the rules, players 2 to 6 are supposed to make their choice simultaneously and they add that if some people want to wait and see what the others are doing, then people should play in turn order.

I think that the best way to enforce simultaneity is to do as for Railroad Ink and make it so that you cannot see what other players (2 to 6) have done this round (both in log and by looking at their sheet, both before and after F5) until you have done your own round.

( And ensure that you don't get problems as in "It's a wonderful world" where players are interrupted in their actions and get weird refreshes when someone else is playing their turn. )

This kind of simultaneity usually requires some work on the architecture of the code and is best done (or at least foreseen) early in the development.

• 何をしたいか、何をしたか、何が起きたかを説明してください

• あなたのブラウザは何ですか?

• あなたの言語の代わりに、表示されている英語の文章をコピー&ペーストしてください。 もしこのバグのスクリーンショットがあれば(素晴らしい!)、Imgur.com等を使ってアップロードし、リンクをコピー&ペーストしてください。

This is between a suggestion and a bug.

As per the rules, players 2 to 6 are supposed to make their choice simultaneously and they add that if some people want to wait and see what the others are doing, then people should play in turn order.

I think that the best way to enforce simultaneity is to do as for Railroad Ink and make it so that you cannot see what other players (2 to 6) have done this round (both in log and by looking at their sheet, both before and after F5) until you have done your own round.

( And ensure that you don't get problems as in "It's a wonderful world" where players are interrupted in their actions and get weird refreshes when someone else is playing their turn. )

This kind of simultaneity usually requires some work on the architecture of the code and is best done (or at least foreseen) early in the development.

• このテキストは翻訳ページで翻訳可能になっていますか?もしそうならば、24時間以上前に翻訳されていますか?

• あなたのブラウザは何ですか?

• 何を意味するのか、簡単に理解できるようにあなたの提案を正確かつ簡潔に説明してください。

This is between a suggestion and a bug.

As per the rules, players 2 to 6 are supposed to make their choice simultaneously and they add that if some people want to wait and see what the others are doing, then people should play in turn order.

I think that the best way to enforce simultaneity is to do as for Railroad Ink and make it so that you cannot see what other players (2 to 6) have done this round (both in log and by looking at their sheet, both before and after F5) until you have done your own round.

( And ensure that you don't get problems as in "It's a wonderful world" where players are interrupted in their actions and get weird refreshes when someone else is playing their turn. )

This kind of simultaneity usually requires some work on the architecture of the code and is best done (or at least foreseen) early in the development.

• あなたのブラウザは何ですか?

• ブロックされたときの表示は何でしたか(空のスクリーン?一部のみのゲームインターフェイス?エラーメッセージ?)

This is between a suggestion and a bug.

As per the rules, players 2 to 6 are supposed to make their choice simultaneously and they add that if some people want to wait and see what the others are doing, then people should play in turn order.

I think that the best way to enforce simultaneity is to do as for Railroad Ink and make it so that you cannot see what other players (2 to 6) have done this round (both in log and by looking at their sheet, both before and after F5) until you have done your own round.

( And ensure that you don't get problems as in "It's a wonderful world" where players are interrupted in their actions and get weird refreshes when someone else is playing their turn. )

This kind of simultaneity usually requires some work on the architecture of the code and is best done (or at least foreseen) early in the development.

• あなたのブラウザは何ですか?

• BGAで正しく実装されていないルールはどの部分ですか?

This is between a suggestion and a bug.

As per the rules, players 2 to 6 are supposed to make their choice simultaneously and they add that if some people want to wait and see what the others are doing, then people should play in turn order.

I think that the best way to enforce simultaneity is to do as for Railroad Ink and make it so that you cannot see what other players (2 to 6) have done this round (both in log and by looking at their sheet, both before and after F5) until you have done your own round.

( And ensure that you don't get problems as in "It's a wonderful world" where players are interrupted in their actions and get weird refreshes when someone else is playing their turn. )

This kind of simultaneity usually requires some work on the architecture of the code and is best done (or at least foreseen) early in the development.

• ルールの間違いはゲームのリプレイで確認できますか?そうであれば、行動番号は何番ですか?

• あなたのブラウザは何ですか?

• やりたかったゲームアクションは何ですか?

This is between a suggestion and a bug.

As per the rules, players 2 to 6 are supposed to make their choice simultaneously and they add that if some people want to wait and see what the others are doing, then people should play in turn order.

I think that the best way to enforce simultaneity is to do as for Railroad Ink and make it so that you cannot see what other players (2 to 6) have done this round (both in log and by looking at their sheet, both before and after F5) until you have done your own round.

( And ensure that you don't get problems as in "It's a wonderful world" where players are interrupted in their actions and get weird refreshes when someone else is playing their turn. )

This kind of simultaneity usually requires some work on the architecture of the code and is best done (or at least foreseen) early in the development.

• このゲームアクションを引き起こす為に何を試みましたか?

• これを行おうとしたときに何が起こりましたか?(エラーメッセージ、ステータスバーメッセージ、他)

• あなたのブラウザは何ですか?

• どの段階でこの問題が起こりましたか?(画面の指示はどうなっていましたか)

This is between a suggestion and a bug.

As per the rules, players 2 to 6 are supposed to make their choice simultaneously and they add that if some people want to wait and see what the others are doing, then people should play in turn order.

I think that the best way to enforce simultaneity is to do as for Railroad Ink and make it so that you cannot see what other players (2 to 6) have done this round (both in log and by looking at their sheet, both before and after F5) until you have done your own round.

( And ensure that you don't get problems as in "It's a wonderful world" where players are interrupted in their actions and get weird refreshes when someone else is playing their turn. )

This kind of simultaneity usually requires some work on the architecture of the code and is best done (or at least foreseen) early in the development.

• ゲームアクションを行おうとしたとき、何が起こりましたか?(エラーメッセージ、ステータスバーメッセージ、他)

• あなたのブラウザは何ですか?

• 表示の問題を説明してください もしこのバグのスクリーンショットがあれば(素晴らしい!)、Imgur.com等を使ってアップロードし、リンクをコピー&ペーストしてください。

This is between a suggestion and a bug.

As per the rules, players 2 to 6 are supposed to make their choice simultaneously and they add that if some people want to wait and see what the others are doing, then people should play in turn order.

I think that the best way to enforce simultaneity is to do as for Railroad Ink and make it so that you cannot see what other players (2 to 6) have done this round (both in log and by looking at their sheet, both before and after F5) until you have done your own round.

( And ensure that you don't get problems as in "It's a wonderful world" where players are interrupted in their actions and get weird refreshes when someone else is playing their turn. )

This kind of simultaneity usually requires some work on the architecture of the code and is best done (or at least foreseen) early in the development.

• あなたのブラウザは何ですか?

• あなたの言語の代わりに、表示されている英語の文章をコピー&ペーストしてください。 もしこのバグのスクリーンショットがあれば(素晴らしい!)、Imgur.com等を使ってアップロードし、リンクをコピー&ペーストしてください。

This is between a suggestion and a bug.

As per the rules, players 2 to 6 are supposed to make their choice simultaneously and they add that if some people want to wait and see what the others are doing, then people should play in turn order.

I think that the best way to enforce simultaneity is to do as for Railroad Ink and make it so that you cannot see what other players (2 to 6) have done this round (both in log and by looking at their sheet, both before and after F5) until you have done your own round.

( And ensure that you don't get problems as in "It's a wonderful world" where players are interrupted in their actions and get weird refreshes when someone else is playing their turn. )

This kind of simultaneity usually requires some work on the architecture of the code and is best done (or at least foreseen) early in the development.

• このテキストは翻訳ページで翻訳可能になっていますか?もしそうならば、24時間以上前に翻訳されていますか?

• あなたのブラウザは何ですか?

• 何を意味するのか、簡単に理解できるようにあなたの提案を正確かつ簡潔に説明してください。

This is between a suggestion and a bug.

As per the rules, players 2 to 6 are supposed to make their choice simultaneously and they add that if some people want to wait and see what the others are doing, then people should play in turn order.

I think that the best way to enforce simultaneity is to do as for Railroad Ink and make it so that you cannot see what other players (2 to 6) have done this round (both in log and by looking at their sheet, both before and after F5) until you have done your own round.

( And ensure that you don't get problems as in "It's a wonderful world" where players are interrupted in their actions and get weird refreshes when someone else is playing their turn. )

This kind of simultaneity usually requires some work on the architecture of the code and is best done (or at least foreseen) early in the development.

• あなたのブラウザは何ですか?