全ての報告
ウィザード(Wizard)の報告
#44827: "Added new game length options for Wizard (more balance, more benefits)"
implemented: この提案は実行されました
28
どういった内容ですか?
どうしましたか?以下から選んでください
提案:次項がゲームを大きく改善すると思われる
詳細
-
• 何を意味するのか、簡単に理解できるようにあなたの提案を正確かつ簡潔に説明してください。
If I have 10~15 minutes to play the game.
I think "Amigo Championship Rules" needs more time, and "5 Rounds" loses the value of the game .
"Amigo Champion Rules" takes 25~35 minutes to play.
"Round 5" is just to feel the game, luck is more important.
It is suggested to add a game length option.
a. 7 rounds (1~7 rounds)
b. odd rounds (1.3.5.7.9.11.13.15)
c. customized?
c-1. (1.3.5.11.13.15)
c-2. (1.5.8.11.15)
If there are more game length options, it can allow more players who only have a little time to play the game. • あなたのブラウザは何ですか?
Google Chrome v91
報告履歴
2021年Jul14日 7:22 • Berlas • この提案はまだ開発者によって解析されていません:
Good idea to add the 7 rounds rule, but the arena rules should stick to 10 to nds as is
2021年Jul14日 8:02 • abcdd2829 • この提案はまだ開発者によって解析されていません:
Thanks,
I think more option for game length is good to play
I think more option for game length is good to play
2021年Jul15日 2:19 • MGoulet • 開発者はこの提案に対して詳細を求めています:
Adding a 7 rounds is ok and pretty easy to do it (option A) since all configurations go up to 7 cards. But, adding 2 more rounds is what you really like (and vote for)? Maybe a configuration like 2 to 8 cards and skip the 1 card.
For option B, C-1 and C-2 it can be played in 3 or 4 players games (restrictive).
For option B, C-1 and C-2 it can be played in 3 or 4 players games (restrictive).
2021年Jul15日 3:46 • abcdd2829 • 開発者はこの提案に対して詳細を求めています:
Hi MGoulet
My purpose is every player can enjoy game with "10~15 min"
Now "Round 5" is just to feel the game, luck is more important.(card less ,so difficult to reverse game)
I strongly want 1 round because of the "foresight" rule,so I think 7 rounds is most easily.
If I need more game fun, I may need more cards, if only 10~15 minutes, I think maybe
5~6 turn for 3~6 player
3 player (1.5.9.13.17.20)
4 player (1.4.7.10.13.15)
5 player (1.3.5.7.9.11.12)
6 player (1.3.5.7.9.10)
We all like to play this game, but a round takes a long time. I play "Round 5" most often. I often encounter an opponent who feels that the "fifth round" is unbalanced, but does not have more time to play the "Amigo Championship Rules".
Thanks
My purpose is every player can enjoy game with "10~15 min"
Now "Round 5" is just to feel the game, luck is more important.(card less ,so difficult to reverse game)
I strongly want 1 round because of the "foresight" rule,so I think 7 rounds is most easily.
If I need more game fun, I may need more cards, if only 10~15 minutes, I think maybe
5~6 turn for 3~6 player
3 player (1.5.9.13.17.20)
4 player (1.4.7.10.13.15)
5 player (1.3.5.7.9.11.12)
6 player (1.3.5.7.9.10)
We all like to play this game, but a round takes a long time. I play "Round 5" most often. I often encounter an opponent who feels that the "fifth round" is unbalanced, but does not have more time to play the "Amigo Championship Rules".
Thanks
2021年Jul15日 7:11 • abcdd2829 • 開発者はこの提案に対して詳細を求めています:
Hi MGoulet
I think "7 rounds" is good to speed play(card is less), "customized" as follow is high efficiency to play(need more time).
Each has its own advantages
5~6 turn for 3~6 player
3 player (1.5.9.13.17.20)
4 player (1.4.7.10.13.15)
5 player (1.3.5.7.9.11.12)
6 player (1.3.5.7.9.10)
Thanks
I think "7 rounds" is good to speed play(card is less), "customized" as follow is high efficiency to play(need more time).
Each has its own advantages
5~6 turn for 3~6 player
3 player (1.5.9.13.17.20)
4 player (1.4.7.10.13.15)
5 player (1.3.5.7.9.11.12)
6 player (1.3.5.7.9.10)
Thanks
2021年Jul17日 4:48 • abcdd2829 • 開発者はこの提案に対して詳細を求めています:
Hi MGoulet
Sorry to modify customized.
After I talk with other voting players, it may be revised as follows and it may not take more time.
imgur.com/ORu2M3U
all player need first turn for the "foresight" rule, last turn for "Jester".
3 player use "5 gap" add. (i.e. 1.6.11.16.20)
4 player use "4 gap" add. (i.e. 1.5.9.13.15)
5 player use "3 gap" add. (i.e. 1.4.7.10.12)
6 player use "2 gap" add. (i.e. 1.3.5.7.9.10) or (1.3.5.7.10)
3 player total use 162 cards (save 51% time with "Amigo Tournament Rules"
4 player total use 172 cards (save 53% time with "Amigo Tournament Rules"
5 player total use 170 cards (save 54% time with "Amigo Tournament Rules"
6 player type 1 total use 210 cards (save 37% time with "Default Rules"
6 player type 2 total use 156 cards (save 53% time with "Default Rules"
Thanks
Sorry to modify customized.
After I talk with other voting players, it may be revised as follows and it may not take more time.
imgur.com/ORu2M3U
all player need first turn for the "foresight" rule, last turn for "Jester".
3 player use "5 gap" add. (i.e. 1.6.11.16.20)
4 player use "4 gap" add. (i.e. 1.5.9.13.15)
5 player use "3 gap" add. (i.e. 1.4.7.10.12)
6 player use "2 gap" add. (i.e. 1.3.5.7.9.10) or (1.3.5.7.10)
3 player total use 162 cards (save 51% time with "Amigo Tournament Rules"
4 player total use 172 cards (save 53% time with "Amigo Tournament Rules"
5 player total use 170 cards (save 54% time with "Amigo Tournament Rules"
6 player type 1 total use 210 cards (save 37% time with "Default Rules"
6 player type 2 total use 156 cards (save 53% time with "Default Rules"
Thanks
2021年Jul18日 20:16 • MGoulet • 開発者はそれが良い考えであることに同意し、それに取り組むつもりです:
Thanks for the information.
For 6 players, maybe you should consider (1.3.5.8.10) = Total 162 or (1.3.6.8.10) = Total 168 (it's more in line with the others configurations.
I will rewrite the options "5 rounds" for (First 5 rounds)
I'll add "Last 5 rounds" and for your configuration, i'll display "Special 5 rounds". Is that ok with you?
For 6 players, maybe you should consider (1.3.5.8.10) = Total 162 or (1.3.6.8.10) = Total 168 (it's more in line with the others configurations.
I will rewrite the options "5 rounds" for (First 5 rounds)
I'll add "Last 5 rounds" and for your configuration, i'll display "Special 5 rounds". Is that ok with you?
2021年Jul19日 6:23 • abcdd2829 • 開発者はそれが良い考えであることに同意し、それに取り組むつもりです:
Hi MGoulet
I am confused to choose (1.3.5.8.10) or (1.3.6.8.10) or (1.3.5.7.9.10) or (1.3.5.7.10).
After talking about other voting players,keep time-consuming ideas.
Add thinking logic is as follows
It need has "few cards rounds" (some players may not have a specific color) and "many cards rounds" for skill play.
It is better to need "first round" and two "less card rounds" and two "many card rounds" and the last round.
3 player use 1.6.11.16.20 => 1.2.4.11.16.20 (total use 162 cards) not change time-consuming.
3 player use 1.5.9.13.15 => 1.2.3.9.13.15 (total use 172 cards) not change time-consuming.
5 player use 1.4.7.10.12 => 1.2.3.8.10.12 (total use 180 cards).
6 player use 1.2.3.7.9.10 (total use 192 cards).
or
6 player use 1.3.6.8.10 (total use 168 cards).
If there are more players, more cards can be used because they can "pre-select cards" to save time.
So I think 1.2.3.7.9.10 (a total of 192 cards are used). It could be better.
imgur.com/KUg0S9S
red for "few cards rounds"
yellow for "many cards rounds"
==
I think need keep original "First 5 rounds" option for new player feel the game.
I think the "last 5 rounds" play a good play in skills.
I will play it in the actual game, but we take turns to play.
It is fair to every predicted player.
That is, 3 players play 3 rounds. 6 people play 6 rounds, no final round.
==
But I think we need to add "7 rounds" because it is fun and some voting players like it.
It's easy to play.
Thanks
I am confused to choose (1.3.5.8.10) or (1.3.6.8.10) or (1.3.5.7.9.10) or (1.3.5.7.10).
After talking about other voting players,keep time-consuming ideas.
Add thinking logic is as follows
It need has "few cards rounds" (some players may not have a specific color) and "many cards rounds" for skill play.
It is better to need "first round" and two "less card rounds" and two "many card rounds" and the last round.
3 player use 1.6.11.16.20 => 1.2.4.11.16.20 (total use 162 cards) not change time-consuming.
3 player use 1.5.9.13.15 => 1.2.3.9.13.15 (total use 172 cards) not change time-consuming.
5 player use 1.4.7.10.12 => 1.2.3.8.10.12 (total use 180 cards).
6 player use 1.2.3.7.9.10 (total use 192 cards).
or
6 player use 1.3.6.8.10 (total use 168 cards).
If there are more players, more cards can be used because they can "pre-select cards" to save time.
So I think 1.2.3.7.9.10 (a total of 192 cards are used). It could be better.
imgur.com/KUg0S9S
red for "few cards rounds"
yellow for "many cards rounds"
==
I think need keep original "First 5 rounds" option for new player feel the game.
I think the "last 5 rounds" play a good play in skills.
I will play it in the actual game, but we take turns to play.
It is fair to every predicted player.
That is, 3 players play 3 rounds. 6 people play 6 rounds, no final round.
==
But I think we need to add "7 rounds" because it is fun and some voting players like it.
It's easy to play.
Thanks
2021年Jul19日 14:02 • MGoulet • 開発者はそれが良い考えであることに同意し、それに取り組むつもりです:
All your suggestion is 5 or 6 rounds, not 7 rounds =\
2021年Jul19日 17:01 • abcdd2829 • 開発者はそれが良い考えであることに同意し、それに取り組むつもりです:
Hi MGoulet
"7 rounds" is (1.2.3.4.5.6.7) for easily play option.
It is more depth than "first 5 rounds"
Thanks
"7 rounds" is (1.2.3.4.5.6.7) for easily play option.
It is more depth than "first 5 rounds"
Thanks
2021年Jul19日 18:47 • MGoulet • 開発者はそれが良い考えであることに同意し、それに取り組むつもりです:
Ok, so you want a 7 rounds + a special configuration in 5 rounds
2021年Jul20日 6:09 • abcdd2829 • 開発者はそれが良い考えであることに同意し、それに取り組むつもりです:
Hi MGoulet
Yes,
and you want add "last player rounds" or not?
3 players (17.18.19)
4 players (11.12.13.14)
5 players (7.8.9.10.11)
6 players (4.5.6.7.8.9)
Thanks
Yes,
and you want add "last player rounds" or not?
3 players (17.18.19)
4 players (11.12.13.14)
5 players (7.8.9.10.11)
6 players (4.5.6.7.8.9)
Thanks
2021年Jul20日 7:13 • abcdd2829 • 開発者はそれが良い考えであることに同意し、それに取り組むつもりです:
Hi MGoulet
Yes,
I want
A."7 rounds" (1.2.3.4.5.6.7)
B. "special configuration 6 rounds"
3 player use 1.6.11.16.20 => 1.2.4.11.16.20 (total use 162 cards) not change time-consuming.
4 player use 1.5.9.13.15 => 1.2.3.9.13.15 (total use 172 cards) not change time-consuming.
5 player use 1.4.7.10.12 => 1.2.3.8.10.12 (total use 180 cards).
6 player use 1.2.3.7.9.10 (total use 192 cards).
and you want add "last player rounds" or not?
C. "last player rounds"
3 players (17.18.19)
4 players (11.12.13.14)
5 players (7.8.9.10.11)
6 players (4.5.6.7.8.9)
D. rewrite the options "5 rounds" for (First 5 rounds)
Thanks
Yes,
I want
A."7 rounds" (1.2.3.4.5.6.7)
B. "special configuration 6 rounds"
3 player use 1.6.11.16.20 => 1.2.4.11.16.20 (total use 162 cards) not change time-consuming.
4 player use 1.5.9.13.15 => 1.2.3.9.13.15 (total use 172 cards) not change time-consuming.
5 player use 1.4.7.10.12 => 1.2.3.8.10.12 (total use 180 cards).
6 player use 1.2.3.7.9.10 (total use 192 cards).
and you want add "last player rounds" or not?
C. "last player rounds"
3 players (17.18.19)
4 players (11.12.13.14)
5 players (7.8.9.10.11)
6 players (4.5.6.7.8.9)
D. rewrite the options "5 rounds" for (First 5 rounds)
Thanks
2021年Jul21日 12:54 • abcdd2829 • 開発者はそれが良い考えであることに同意し、それに取り組むつもりです:
Hi MGoulet
so modify as follow
A."7 rounds" (1.2.3.4.5.6.7)
B. "special configuration 6 rounds"
3 player use 1.2.4.11.16.20 (total use 162 cards).
4 player use 1.2.3.9.13.15 (total use 172 cards).
5 player use 1.2.3.8.10.12 (total use 180 cards).
6 player use 1.2.3.7.9.10 (total use 192 cards).
C. rewrite the options "5 rounds" for (First 5 rounds)
D. others "last 5 rounds"?
Thanks
so modify as follow
A."7 rounds" (1.2.3.4.5.6.7)
B. "special configuration 6 rounds"
3 player use 1.2.4.11.16.20 (total use 162 cards).
4 player use 1.2.3.9.13.15 (total use 172 cards).
5 player use 1.2.3.8.10.12 (total use 180 cards).
6 player use 1.2.3.7.9.10 (total use 192 cards).
C. rewrite the options "5 rounds" for (First 5 rounds)
D. others "last 5 rounds"?
Thanks
報告に書き加える
このバグを再現するため、またはあなたの提案を理解するために、ここに関連性があると思われるものを追加してください:
- 他のテーブルID/行動ID
- F5キー(ページの再読込)で問題は解決されましたか?
- 問題は何回も起こりましたか?毎回 起こりますか?ランダムに起きますか?
- もしこのバグのスクリーンショットがあれば(素晴らしい!)、Imgur.com等を使ってアップロードし、リンクをコピー&ペーストしてください。
