• もしあれば、画面に表示されたエラーメッセージをコピー&ペーストしてください

Pg 12 - 13 English Print Rules:
Distress-Signals for an easier game: "...DECIDE TOGETHER whether you want to make the use of this assistance then turn the distress signal token to its active side..."

"DECIDE TOGETHER if you will pass the cards to the left or right..."

• 何をしたいか、何をしたか、何が起きたかを説明してください

Per the rules in the book the distress signal should a group choice. However, per the BGA implementation any person can press the distress signal without anyone else having a say in this.
Then once activated, the Captain is given the choice on direction, without input from the group.
This clearly violates the concept of "decide together" which indicates a group choice.

Instead, a better method would be to have a button which players could use to indicate their desire to use the distress signal, that would then be codified by a majority rule, with captain being tie-breaker.

The same concept would be used for deciding the direction, by allowing each player a single vote for Right or Left, or no pass or no preference option, with ties being decided by the Captain.

Alternatively allowing an undo if the group decides they do not want to use to distress signal.

• あなたのブラウザは何ですか?

• あなたの言語の代わりに、表示されている英語の文章をコピー&ペーストしてください。 もしこのバグのスクリーンショットがあれば(素晴らしい!)、Imgur.com等を使ってアップロードし、リンクをコピー&ペーストしてください。

Pg 12 - 13 English Print Rules:
Distress-Signals for an easier game: "...DECIDE TOGETHER whether you want to make the use of this assistance then turn the distress signal token to its active side..."

"DECIDE TOGETHER if you will pass the cards to the left or right..."

• このテキストは翻訳ページで翻訳可能になっていますか?もしそうならば、24時間以上前に翻訳されていますか?

Per the rules in the book the distress signal should a group choice. However, per the BGA implementation any person can press the distress signal without anyone else having a say in this.
Then once activated, the Captain is given the choice on direction, without input from the group.
This clearly violates the concept of "decide together" which indicates a group choice.

Instead, a better method would be to have a button which players could use to indicate their desire to use the distress signal, that would then be codified by a majority rule, with captain being tie-breaker.

The same concept would be used for deciding the direction, by allowing each player a single vote for Right or Left, or no pass or no preference option, with ties being decided by the Captain.

Alternatively allowing an undo if the group decides they do not want to use to distress signal.

• あなたのブラウザは何ですか?

• 何を意味するのか、簡単に理解できるようにあなたの提案を正確かつ簡潔に説明してください。

Pg 12 - 13 English Print Rules:
Distress-Signals for an easier game: "...DECIDE TOGETHER whether you want to make the use of this assistance then turn the distress signal token to its active side..."

"DECIDE TOGETHER if you will pass the cards to the left or right..."

• あなたのブラウザは何ですか?

• ブロックされたときの表示は何でしたか(空のスクリーン?一部のみのゲームインターフェイス?エラーメッセージ?)

Pg 12 - 13 English Print Rules:
Distress-Signals for an easier game: "...DECIDE TOGETHER whether you want to make the use of this assistance then turn the distress signal token to its active side..."

"DECIDE TOGETHER if you will pass the cards to the left or right..."

• あなたのブラウザは何ですか?

• BGAで正しく実装されていないルールはどの部分ですか?

Pg 12 - 13 English Print Rules:
Distress-Signals for an easier game: "...DECIDE TOGETHER whether you want to make the use of this assistance then turn the distress signal token to its active side..."

"DECIDE TOGETHER if you will pass the cards to the left or right..."

• ルールの間違いはゲームのリプレイで確認できますか?そうであれば、行動番号は何番ですか?

Per the rules in the book the distress signal should a group choice. However, per the BGA implementation any person can press the distress signal without anyone else having a say in this.
Then once activated, the Captain is given the choice on direction, without input from the group.
This clearly violates the concept of "decide together" which indicates a group choice.

Instead, a better method would be to have a button which players could use to indicate their desire to use the distress signal, that would then be codified by a majority rule, with captain being tie-breaker.

The same concept would be used for deciding the direction, by allowing each player a single vote for Right or Left, or no pass or no preference option, with ties being decided by the Captain.

Alternatively allowing an undo if the group decides they do not want to use to distress signal.

• あなたのブラウザは何ですか?

• やりたかったゲームアクションは何ですか?

Pg 12 - 13 English Print Rules:
Distress-Signals for an easier game: "...DECIDE TOGETHER whether you want to make the use of this assistance then turn the distress signal token to its active side..."

"DECIDE TOGETHER if you will pass the cards to the left or right..."

• このゲームアクションを引き起こす為に何を試みましたか?

Per the rules in the book the distress signal should a group choice. However, per the BGA implementation any person can press the distress signal without anyone else having a say in this.
Then once activated, the Captain is given the choice on direction, without input from the group.
This clearly violates the concept of "decide together" which indicates a group choice.

Instead, a better method would be to have a button which players could use to indicate their desire to use the distress signal, that would then be codified by a majority rule, with captain being tie-breaker.

The same concept would be used for deciding the direction, by allowing each player a single vote for Right or Left, or no pass or no preference option, with ties being decided by the Captain.

Alternatively allowing an undo if the group decides they do not want to use to distress signal.

• これを行おうとしたときに何が起こりましたか?(エラーメッセージ、ステータスバーメッセージ、他)

• あなたのブラウザは何ですか?

• どの段階でこの問題が起こりましたか?(画面の指示はどうなっていましたか)

Pg 12 - 13 English Print Rules:
Distress-Signals for an easier game: "...DECIDE TOGETHER whether you want to make the use of this assistance then turn the distress signal token to its active side..."

"DECIDE TOGETHER if you will pass the cards to the left or right..."

• ゲームアクションを行おうとしたとき、何が起こりましたか?(エラーメッセージ、ステータスバーメッセージ、他)

Per the rules in the book the distress signal should a group choice. However, per the BGA implementation any person can press the distress signal without anyone else having a say in this.
Then once activated, the Captain is given the choice on direction, without input from the group.
This clearly violates the concept of "decide together" which indicates a group choice.

Instead, a better method would be to have a button which players could use to indicate their desire to use the distress signal, that would then be codified by a majority rule, with captain being tie-breaker.

The same concept would be used for deciding the direction, by allowing each player a single vote for Right or Left, or no pass or no preference option, with ties being decided by the Captain.

Alternatively allowing an undo if the group decides they do not want to use to distress signal.

• あなたのブラウザは何ですか?

• 表示の問題を説明してください もしこのバグのスクリーンショットがあれば(素晴らしい!)、Imgur.com等を使ってアップロードし、リンクをコピー&ペーストしてください。

Pg 12 - 13 English Print Rules:
Distress-Signals for an easier game: "...DECIDE TOGETHER whether you want to make the use of this assistance then turn the distress signal token to its active side..."

"DECIDE TOGETHER if you will pass the cards to the left or right..."

• あなたのブラウザは何ですか?

• あなたの言語の代わりに、表示されている英語の文章をコピー&ペーストしてください。 もしこのバグのスクリーンショットがあれば(素晴らしい!)、Imgur.com等を使ってアップロードし、リンクをコピー&ペーストしてください。

Pg 12 - 13 English Print Rules:
Distress-Signals for an easier game: "...DECIDE TOGETHER whether you want to make the use of this assistance then turn the distress signal token to its active side..."

"DECIDE TOGETHER if you will pass the cards to the left or right..."

• このテキストは翻訳ページで翻訳可能になっていますか?もしそうならば、24時間以上前に翻訳されていますか?

Per the rules in the book the distress signal should a group choice. However, per the BGA implementation any person can press the distress signal without anyone else having a say in this.
Then once activated, the Captain is given the choice on direction, without input from the group.
This clearly violates the concept of "decide together" which indicates a group choice.

Instead, a better method would be to have a button which players could use to indicate their desire to use the distress signal, that would then be codified by a majority rule, with captain being tie-breaker.

The same concept would be used for deciding the direction, by allowing each player a single vote for Right or Left, or no pass or no preference option, with ties being decided by the Captain.

Alternatively allowing an undo if the group decides they do not want to use to distress signal.

• あなたのブラウザは何ですか?

• 何を意味するのか、簡単に理解できるようにあなたの提案を正確かつ簡潔に説明してください。

Pg 12 - 13 English Print Rules:
Distress-Signals for an easier game: "...DECIDE TOGETHER whether you want to make the use of this assistance then turn the distress signal token to its active side..."

"DECIDE TOGETHER if you will pass the cards to the left or right..."

• あなたのブラウザは何ですか?