• もしあれば、画面に表示されたエラーメッセージをコピー&ペーストしてください

Currently, when "the judge" card comes into play, the blue cards in front of a player are ineffective during that turn. But also, a player is unable to place new blue cards from one's hand in front of him/her. Is this the original meaning of "the judge" cards as well or is it so because it is easier to program this way?

In my mind "the judge" cards now has a double effect: 1) one cannot play the blue cards already placed earlier in front of you, 2) but also one cannot place new blue cards in front of you. "The judge" card does not straightforwardly deny this, only that during this round the blue cards are ineffective. This could be true even though one could place new blue cards as well for the future rounds. Now especially if a player has little health left and draws two blue cards from the deck, might be forced to discard both of them because unable to place them in front of oneself.

I just wanted to bring this nyance into your consideration whether this is the intention of the card as well (which is currently so. See game #625947142 Taavi's turn). Would you consider if this is also the meaning of the card as well or not. The other option would be that during "the judge" one could place down blue cards as well but for this round they remain ineffective. If you think my suggestion is not a good idea, it is also fine by me, just give it a thought please, what was the original meaning of "the judge" alltogether.

Cheers and thanx for the online Bang! It has been a blast!
Matti from Finland

• 何をしたいか、何をしたか、何が起きたかを説明してください

• あなたのブラウザは何ですか?

• あなたの言語の代わりに、表示されている英語の文章をコピー&ペーストしてください。 もしこのバグのスクリーンショットがあれば(素晴らしい!)、Imgur.com等を使ってアップロードし、リンクをコピー&ペーストしてください。

Currently, when "the judge" card comes into play, the blue cards in front of a player are ineffective during that turn. But also, a player is unable to place new blue cards from one's hand in front of him/her. Is this the original meaning of "the judge" cards as well or is it so because it is easier to program this way?

In my mind "the judge" cards now has a double effect: 1) one cannot play the blue cards already placed earlier in front of you, 2) but also one cannot place new blue cards in front of you. "The judge" card does not straightforwardly deny this, only that during this round the blue cards are ineffective. This could be true even though one could place new blue cards as well for the future rounds. Now especially if a player has little health left and draws two blue cards from the deck, might be forced to discard both of them because unable to place them in front of oneself.

I just wanted to bring this nyance into your consideration whether this is the intention of the card as well (which is currently so. See game #625947142 Taavi's turn). Would you consider if this is also the meaning of the card as well or not. The other option would be that during "the judge" one could place down blue cards as well but for this round they remain ineffective. If you think my suggestion is not a good idea, it is also fine by me, just give it a thought please, what was the original meaning of "the judge" alltogether.

Cheers and thanx for the online Bang! It has been a blast!
Matti from Finland

• このテキストは翻訳ページで翻訳可能になっていますか?もしそうならば、24時間以上前に翻訳されていますか?

• あなたのブラウザは何ですか?

• 何を意味するのか、簡単に理解できるようにあなたの提案を正確かつ簡潔に説明してください。

Currently, when "the judge" card comes into play, the blue cards in front of a player are ineffective during that turn. But also, a player is unable to place new blue cards from one's hand in front of him/her. Is this the original meaning of "the judge" cards as well or is it so because it is easier to program this way?

In my mind "the judge" cards now has a double effect: 1) one cannot play the blue cards already placed earlier in front of you, 2) but also one cannot place new blue cards in front of you. "The judge" card does not straightforwardly deny this, only that during this round the blue cards are ineffective. This could be true even though one could place new blue cards as well for the future rounds. Now especially if a player has little health left and draws two blue cards from the deck, might be forced to discard both of them because unable to place them in front of oneself.

I just wanted to bring this nyance into your consideration whether this is the intention of the card as well (which is currently so. See game #625947142 Taavi's turn). Would you consider if this is also the meaning of the card as well or not. The other option would be that during "the judge" one could place down blue cards as well but for this round they remain ineffective. If you think my suggestion is not a good idea, it is also fine by me, just give it a thought please, what was the original meaning of "the judge" alltogether.

Cheers and thanx for the online Bang! It has been a blast!
Matti from Finland

• あなたのブラウザは何ですか?

• ブロックされたときの表示は何でしたか(空のスクリーン?一部のみのゲームインターフェイス?エラーメッセージ?)

Currently, when "the judge" card comes into play, the blue cards in front of a player are ineffective during that turn. But also, a player is unable to place new blue cards from one's hand in front of him/her. Is this the original meaning of "the judge" cards as well or is it so because it is easier to program this way?

In my mind "the judge" cards now has a double effect: 1) one cannot play the blue cards already placed earlier in front of you, 2) but also one cannot place new blue cards in front of you. "The judge" card does not straightforwardly deny this, only that during this round the blue cards are ineffective. This could be true even though one could place new blue cards as well for the future rounds. Now especially if a player has little health left and draws two blue cards from the deck, might be forced to discard both of them because unable to place them in front of oneself.

I just wanted to bring this nyance into your consideration whether this is the intention of the card as well (which is currently so. See game #625947142 Taavi's turn). Would you consider if this is also the meaning of the card as well or not. The other option would be that during "the judge" one could place down blue cards as well but for this round they remain ineffective. If you think my suggestion is not a good idea, it is also fine by me, just give it a thought please, what was the original meaning of "the judge" alltogether.

Cheers and thanx for the online Bang! It has been a blast!
Matti from Finland

• あなたのブラウザは何ですか?

• BGAで正しく実装されていないルールはどの部分ですか?

Currently, when "the judge" card comes into play, the blue cards in front of a player are ineffective during that turn. But also, a player is unable to place new blue cards from one's hand in front of him/her. Is this the original meaning of "the judge" cards as well or is it so because it is easier to program this way?

In my mind "the judge" cards now has a double effect: 1) one cannot play the blue cards already placed earlier in front of you, 2) but also one cannot place new blue cards in front of you. "The judge" card does not straightforwardly deny this, only that during this round the blue cards are ineffective. This could be true even though one could place new blue cards as well for the future rounds. Now especially if a player has little health left and draws two blue cards from the deck, might be forced to discard both of them because unable to place them in front of oneself.

I just wanted to bring this nyance into your consideration whether this is the intention of the card as well (which is currently so. See game #625947142 Taavi's turn). Would you consider if this is also the meaning of the card as well or not. The other option would be that during "the judge" one could place down blue cards as well but for this round they remain ineffective. If you think my suggestion is not a good idea, it is also fine by me, just give it a thought please, what was the original meaning of "the judge" alltogether.

Cheers and thanx for the online Bang! It has been a blast!
Matti from Finland

• ルールの間違いはゲームのリプレイで確認できますか?そうであれば、行動番号は何番ですか?

• あなたのブラウザは何ですか?

• やりたかったゲームアクションは何ですか?

Currently, when "the judge" card comes into play, the blue cards in front of a player are ineffective during that turn. But also, a player is unable to place new blue cards from one's hand in front of him/her. Is this the original meaning of "the judge" cards as well or is it so because it is easier to program this way?

In my mind "the judge" cards now has a double effect: 1) one cannot play the blue cards already placed earlier in front of you, 2) but also one cannot place new blue cards in front of you. "The judge" card does not straightforwardly deny this, only that during this round the blue cards are ineffective. This could be true even though one could place new blue cards as well for the future rounds. Now especially if a player has little health left and draws two blue cards from the deck, might be forced to discard both of them because unable to place them in front of oneself.

I just wanted to bring this nyance into your consideration whether this is the intention of the card as well (which is currently so. See game #625947142 Taavi's turn). Would you consider if this is also the meaning of the card as well or not. The other option would be that during "the judge" one could place down blue cards as well but for this round they remain ineffective. If you think my suggestion is not a good idea, it is also fine by me, just give it a thought please, what was the original meaning of "the judge" alltogether.

Cheers and thanx for the online Bang! It has been a blast!
Matti from Finland

• このゲームアクションを引き起こす為に何を試みましたか?

• これを行おうとしたときに何が起こりましたか?(エラーメッセージ、ステータスバーメッセージ、他)

• あなたのブラウザは何ですか?

• どの段階でこの問題が起こりましたか?(画面の指示はどうなっていましたか)

Currently, when "the judge" card comes into play, the blue cards in front of a player are ineffective during that turn. But also, a player is unable to place new blue cards from one's hand in front of him/her. Is this the original meaning of "the judge" cards as well or is it so because it is easier to program this way?

In my mind "the judge" cards now has a double effect: 1) one cannot play the blue cards already placed earlier in front of you, 2) but also one cannot place new blue cards in front of you. "The judge" card does not straightforwardly deny this, only that during this round the blue cards are ineffective. This could be true even though one could place new blue cards as well for the future rounds. Now especially if a player has little health left and draws two blue cards from the deck, might be forced to discard both of them because unable to place them in front of oneself.

I just wanted to bring this nyance into your consideration whether this is the intention of the card as well (which is currently so. See game #625947142 Taavi's turn). Would you consider if this is also the meaning of the card as well or not. The other option would be that during "the judge" one could place down blue cards as well but for this round they remain ineffective. If you think my suggestion is not a good idea, it is also fine by me, just give it a thought please, what was the original meaning of "the judge" alltogether.

Cheers and thanx for the online Bang! It has been a blast!
Matti from Finland

• ゲームアクションを行おうとしたとき、何が起こりましたか?(エラーメッセージ、ステータスバーメッセージ、他)

• あなたのブラウザは何ですか?

• 表示の問題を説明してください もしこのバグのスクリーンショットがあれば(素晴らしい!)、Imgur.com等を使ってアップロードし、リンクをコピー&ペーストしてください。

Currently, when "the judge" card comes into play, the blue cards in front of a player are ineffective during that turn. But also, a player is unable to place new blue cards from one's hand in front of him/her. Is this the original meaning of "the judge" cards as well or is it so because it is easier to program this way?

In my mind "the judge" cards now has a double effect: 1) one cannot play the blue cards already placed earlier in front of you, 2) but also one cannot place new blue cards in front of you. "The judge" card does not straightforwardly deny this, only that during this round the blue cards are ineffective. This could be true even though one could place new blue cards as well for the future rounds. Now especially if a player has little health left and draws two blue cards from the deck, might be forced to discard both of them because unable to place them in front of oneself.

I just wanted to bring this nyance into your consideration whether this is the intention of the card as well (which is currently so. See game #625947142 Taavi's turn). Would you consider if this is also the meaning of the card as well or not. The other option would be that during "the judge" one could place down blue cards as well but for this round they remain ineffective. If you think my suggestion is not a good idea, it is also fine by me, just give it a thought please, what was the original meaning of "the judge" alltogether.

Cheers and thanx for the online Bang! It has been a blast!
Matti from Finland

• あなたのブラウザは何ですか?

• あなたの言語の代わりに、表示されている英語の文章をコピー&ペーストしてください。 もしこのバグのスクリーンショットがあれば(素晴らしい!)、Imgur.com等を使ってアップロードし、リンクをコピー&ペーストしてください。

Currently, when "the judge" card comes into play, the blue cards in front of a player are ineffective during that turn. But also, a player is unable to place new blue cards from one's hand in front of him/her. Is this the original meaning of "the judge" cards as well or is it so because it is easier to program this way?

In my mind "the judge" cards now has a double effect: 1) one cannot play the blue cards already placed earlier in front of you, 2) but also one cannot place new blue cards in front of you. "The judge" card does not straightforwardly deny this, only that during this round the blue cards are ineffective. This could be true even though one could place new blue cards as well for the future rounds. Now especially if a player has little health left and draws two blue cards from the deck, might be forced to discard both of them because unable to place them in front of oneself.

I just wanted to bring this nyance into your consideration whether this is the intention of the card as well (which is currently so. See game #625947142 Taavi's turn). Would you consider if this is also the meaning of the card as well or not. The other option would be that during "the judge" one could place down blue cards as well but for this round they remain ineffective. If you think my suggestion is not a good idea, it is also fine by me, just give it a thought please, what was the original meaning of "the judge" alltogether.

Cheers and thanx for the online Bang! It has been a blast!
Matti from Finland

• このテキストは翻訳ページで翻訳可能になっていますか?もしそうならば、24時間以上前に翻訳されていますか?

• あなたのブラウザは何ですか?

• 何を意味するのか、簡単に理解できるようにあなたの提案を正確かつ簡潔に説明してください。

Currently, when "the judge" card comes into play, the blue cards in front of a player are ineffective during that turn. But also, a player is unable to place new blue cards from one's hand in front of him/her. Is this the original meaning of "the judge" cards as well or is it so because it is easier to program this way?

In my mind "the judge" cards now has a double effect: 1) one cannot play the blue cards already placed earlier in front of you, 2) but also one cannot place new blue cards in front of you. "The judge" card does not straightforwardly deny this, only that during this round the blue cards are ineffective. This could be true even though one could place new blue cards as well for the future rounds. Now especially if a player has little health left and draws two blue cards from the deck, might be forced to discard both of them because unable to place them in front of oneself.

I just wanted to bring this nyance into your consideration whether this is the intention of the card as well (which is currently so. See game #625947142 Taavi's turn). Would you consider if this is also the meaning of the card as well or not. The other option would be that during "the judge" one could place down blue cards as well but for this round they remain ineffective. If you think my suggestion is not a good idea, it is also fine by me, just give it a thought please, what was the original meaning of "the judge" alltogether.

Cheers and thanx for the online Bang! It has been a blast!
Matti from Finland

• あなたのブラウザは何ですか?