報告 • Board Game Arena

全ての報告

サーティーワン(31)の報告

#127276: "Stalemate situation "

implemented: この提案は実行されました

どういった内容ですか?

サーティーワン(31) #524830611

どうしましたか?以下から選んでください

提案:次項がゲームを大きく改善すると思われる

どうしましたか?以下から選んでください

提案:次項がゲームを大きく改善すると思われる

同一内容の報告がないか、ご確認ください

もしそうなら、このレポートに投票してください。投票の多いレポートから調査されます!

#	Status	Votes	Game	Type	Title	Last update

詳細

報告履歴

2024年Jun13日 19:08 • NnSshared • この提案はまだ開発者によって解析されていません:

No other info

2024年Jun13日 20:18 • ufm • 開発者はそれは良い考えではない、あるいは費用対効果が低すぎると考えています:

You have to close the round to get out of the loop.

2024年Jun26日 0:44 • Zeus • 開発者はそれは良い考えではない、あるいは費用対効果が低すぎると考えています:

no it's a very specific scenario where somebody intentionally shuffles to not pass along, and would just grab the 3rd card if the other person closed the round. it can happen that neither player is incentivized to progress the game. would be nice to have a tie offer for these scenarios, they happen somewhat frequently at higher levels - look at this scenario in the round where i am 3-1 ahead: boardgamearena.com/table?table=524830611. i know they have 2 spades, so if i gave them the 8s, they would likely win, so i have to shuffle the hearts instead because passing along would allow them to gain an edge as they would be first to play. in games with a high level friend of mine, we just agree to a tie after a few shuffles, but there should be a better option.

in order for people to not endlessly shuffle anyway, an automatic end of the round if x number of exchanges happen with no progress should also be implemented / added as an optional setting.

2024年Jun26日 3:19 • ufm • 開発者はそれは良い考えではない、あるいは費用対効果が低すぎると考えています:

Closing the round has nothing to do with the next round's first player.

2024年Jun26日 3:30 • Zeus • 開発者はそれは良い考えではない、あるいは費用対効果が低すぎると考えています:

i am aware, what i said is in reference to me not being incentivized to pass along - when he passes, and i pass along, the 3 middle cards are exchanged and it would be his turn first and he so he can take the desired cards. thats why shuffling is the superior move - its a flaw in the game, because it is a stalemate where both players should not progress.

getting an anti-stalemate option would be big for that reason.

in most casual games, it doesn't matter and people will progress to not be annoying, but if played competitively / optimally, this will come up and needs a better solution.

2024年Jun26日 3:38 • ufm • 開発者はそれは良い考えではない、あるいは費用対効果が低すぎると考えています:

Then close the round... Closing is not equivalent to passing.

2024年Jun26日 3:43 • Focus • 開発者はそれは良い考えではない、あるいは費用対効果が低すぎると考えています:

i agree that adding an option to agree to tie the round and/or blocking people from endlessly shuffling in order to block a pass would improve the game

2024年Jun26日 3:52 • Zeus • 開発者はそれは良い考えではない、あるいは費用対効果が低すぎると考えています:

nobody can close profitably there - if you check the scenario from the replay, NnSshared became annoyed and closed, and I then exchanged and won the round.
if played optimally (and he knew that too), he had to continue passing there, and I had to continue shuffling, because I don't have enough to close and win (knowing he has at least 17), and if I did exchange the 8 of Spades, then he could take it and would likely win.

his best move: passing
my best move: shuffling 2 cards

this should be repeated endlessly with optimal play. closing is not an option that either of us can take if we wanted to win. it's an option that progresses the game, but it doesn't favor either player. with good players this happens fairly often and is unavoidable.

Adding a "tie offer" would be great and something most honorable players would want - and an extra optional setting to protect yourself against people potentially abusing it "round automatically closes after 20 moves without progress" would be great.

People could virtually just sit there and shuffle cards, and wait for the other person to get bored / give up. I've had similar scenarios with many players, where nothing but the same exchanges were done for 10 minutes and draw offers via chat were ignored.

2024年Jun26日 4:27 • ufm • この提案は実行されました:

Ok, added automatic closure rule.
If the round does not end after surviving player count x 10 moves after the last card draw (either by round start or fresh draw after all players pass), the round instantly ends.

2024年Jun30日 6:15 • ufm • この提案は実行されました:

Changed to 15 x player count

報告に書き加える

このバグを再現するため、またはあなたの提案を理解するために、ここに関連性があると思われるものを追加してください:

他のテーブルID/行動ID
F5キー(ページの再読込)で問題は解決されましたか?
問題は何回も起こりましたか?毎回起こりますか?ランダムに起きますか?
もしこのバグのスクリーンショットがあれば(素晴らしい!)、Imgur.com等を使ってアップロードし、リンクをコピー&ペーストしてください。

キャンセル報告を更新する

#127276: "Stalemate situation "

どういった内容ですか?

どうしましたか?以下から選んでください

どうしましたか?以下から選んでください

同一内容の報告がないか、ご確認ください

詳細

報告履歴

報告に書き加える

報告の進捗状況を次のように変更します:

ヘルプ

貢献する

ナビゲート

フォロー