• もしあれば、画面に表示されたエラーメッセージをコピー&ペーストしてください

See boardgamearena.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=37045 for details.

I won't go into the details here because of the impossibility to edit for mistakes and the like...

1) It would be nice if the framework allowed game developers to define tournament scoring system(s) specific to each game. Especially for games that do have a IRL tournament scene or for games that simulate sports that have various types of championships....

As an example, a round-robin tournament of football (soccer) could give 3 points per 1 and 1 point per draw

------------------
2) It would be even nicer if game-specific complex tie-breakers could be implemented for tournaments (like using the goal average in a football championship)

---------------
3) Some situations like a "bye" might require a default score to be given for a game that has not been played. It would be nice if game devs could define their own default scores for the game tournaments.
(To go back to the football tournament, giving a "win" is not enough, you might want to also define the number of goals scored for that game. Or maybe not. I'm talking about the freedom for games to define what is best for them)
-----------------------
4) Some games could define multiple scoring systems.

Some systems would only be available in some type of tournaments (like round robin or swiss) and others could be used for all types.

When creating a tournament, the organizer would be able to pick one of the scoring systems available for that game and type of tournament or, of course, use the BGA default one.

• 何をしたいか、何をしたか、何が起きたかを説明してください

• あなたのブラウザは何ですか?

• あなたの言語の代わりに、表示されている英語の文章をコピー&ペーストしてください。 もしこのバグのスクリーンショットがあれば(素晴らしい!)、Imgur.com等を使ってアップロードし、リンクをコピー&ペーストしてください。

See boardgamearena.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=37045 for details.

I won't go into the details here because of the impossibility to edit for mistakes and the like...

1) It would be nice if the framework allowed game developers to define tournament scoring system(s) specific to each game. Especially for games that do have a IRL tournament scene or for games that simulate sports that have various types of championships....

As an example, a round-robin tournament of football (soccer) could give 3 points per 1 and 1 point per draw

------------------
2) It would be even nicer if game-specific complex tie-breakers could be implemented for tournaments (like using the goal average in a football championship)

---------------
3) Some situations like a "bye" might require a default score to be given for a game that has not been played. It would be nice if game devs could define their own default scores for the game tournaments.
(To go back to the football tournament, giving a "win" is not enough, you might want to also define the number of goals scored for that game. Or maybe not. I'm talking about the freedom for games to define what is best for them)
-----------------------
4) Some games could define multiple scoring systems.

Some systems would only be available in some type of tournaments (like round robin or swiss) and others could be used for all types.

When creating a tournament, the organizer would be able to pick one of the scoring systems available for that game and type of tournament or, of course, use the BGA default one.

• このテキストは翻訳ページで翻訳可能になっていますか?もしそうならば、24時間以上前に翻訳されていますか?

• あなたのブラウザは何ですか?

• 何を意味するのか、簡単に理解できるようにあなたの提案を正確かつ簡潔に説明してください。

See boardgamearena.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=37045 for details.

I won't go into the details here because of the impossibility to edit for mistakes and the like...

1) It would be nice if the framework allowed game developers to define tournament scoring system(s) specific to each game. Especially for games that do have a IRL tournament scene or for games that simulate sports that have various types of championships....

As an example, a round-robin tournament of football (soccer) could give 3 points per 1 and 1 point per draw

------------------
2) It would be even nicer if game-specific complex tie-breakers could be implemented for tournaments (like using the goal average in a football championship)

---------------
3) Some situations like a "bye" might require a default score to be given for a game that has not been played. It would be nice if game devs could define their own default scores for the game tournaments.
(To go back to the football tournament, giving a "win" is not enough, you might want to also define the number of goals scored for that game. Or maybe not. I'm talking about the freedom for games to define what is best for them)
-----------------------
4) Some games could define multiple scoring systems.

Some systems would only be available in some type of tournaments (like round robin or swiss) and others could be used for all types.

When creating a tournament, the organizer would be able to pick one of the scoring systems available for that game and type of tournament or, of course, use the BGA default one.

• あなたのブラウザは何ですか?

• ブロックされたときの表示は何でしたか(空のスクリーン?一部のみのゲームインターフェイス?エラーメッセージ?)

See boardgamearena.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=37045 for details.

I won't go into the details here because of the impossibility to edit for mistakes and the like...

1) It would be nice if the framework allowed game developers to define tournament scoring system(s) specific to each game. Especially for games that do have a IRL tournament scene or for games that simulate sports that have various types of championships....

As an example, a round-robin tournament of football (soccer) could give 3 points per 1 and 1 point per draw

------------------
2) It would be even nicer if game-specific complex tie-breakers could be implemented for tournaments (like using the goal average in a football championship)

---------------
3) Some situations like a "bye" might require a default score to be given for a game that has not been played. It would be nice if game devs could define their own default scores for the game tournaments.
(To go back to the football tournament, giving a "win" is not enough, you might want to also define the number of goals scored for that game. Or maybe not. I'm talking about the freedom for games to define what is best for them)
-----------------------
4) Some games could define multiple scoring systems.

Some systems would only be available in some type of tournaments (like round robin or swiss) and others could be used for all types.

When creating a tournament, the organizer would be able to pick one of the scoring systems available for that game and type of tournament or, of course, use the BGA default one.

• あなたのブラウザは何ですか?

• BGAで正しく実装されていないルールはどの部分ですか?

See boardgamearena.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=37045 for details.

I won't go into the details here because of the impossibility to edit for mistakes and the like...

1) It would be nice if the framework allowed game developers to define tournament scoring system(s) specific to each game. Especially for games that do have a IRL tournament scene or for games that simulate sports that have various types of championships....

As an example, a round-robin tournament of football (soccer) could give 3 points per 1 and 1 point per draw

------------------
2) It would be even nicer if game-specific complex tie-breakers could be implemented for tournaments (like using the goal average in a football championship)

---------------
3) Some situations like a "bye" might require a default score to be given for a game that has not been played. It would be nice if game devs could define their own default scores for the game tournaments.
(To go back to the football tournament, giving a "win" is not enough, you might want to also define the number of goals scored for that game. Or maybe not. I'm talking about the freedom for games to define what is best for them)
-----------------------
4) Some games could define multiple scoring systems.

Some systems would only be available in some type of tournaments (like round robin or swiss) and others could be used for all types.

When creating a tournament, the organizer would be able to pick one of the scoring systems available for that game and type of tournament or, of course, use the BGA default one.

• ルールの間違いはゲームのリプレイで確認できますか?そうであれば、行動番号は何番ですか?

• あなたのブラウザは何ですか?

• やりたかったゲームアクションは何ですか?

See boardgamearena.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=37045 for details.

I won't go into the details here because of the impossibility to edit for mistakes and the like...

1) It would be nice if the framework allowed game developers to define tournament scoring system(s) specific to each game. Especially for games that do have a IRL tournament scene or for games that simulate sports that have various types of championships....

As an example, a round-robin tournament of football (soccer) could give 3 points per 1 and 1 point per draw

------------------
2) It would be even nicer if game-specific complex tie-breakers could be implemented for tournaments (like using the goal average in a football championship)

---------------
3) Some situations like a "bye" might require a default score to be given for a game that has not been played. It would be nice if game devs could define their own default scores for the game tournaments.
(To go back to the football tournament, giving a "win" is not enough, you might want to also define the number of goals scored for that game. Or maybe not. I'm talking about the freedom for games to define what is best for them)
-----------------------
4) Some games could define multiple scoring systems.

Some systems would only be available in some type of tournaments (like round robin or swiss) and others could be used for all types.

When creating a tournament, the organizer would be able to pick one of the scoring systems available for that game and type of tournament or, of course, use the BGA default one.

• このゲームアクションを引き起こす為に何を試みましたか?

• これを行おうとしたときに何が起こりましたか?(エラーメッセージ、ステータスバーメッセージ、他)

• あなたのブラウザは何ですか?

• どの段階でこの問題が起こりましたか?(画面の指示はどうなっていましたか)

See boardgamearena.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=37045 for details.

I won't go into the details here because of the impossibility to edit for mistakes and the like...

1) It would be nice if the framework allowed game developers to define tournament scoring system(s) specific to each game. Especially for games that do have a IRL tournament scene or for games that simulate sports that have various types of championships....

As an example, a round-robin tournament of football (soccer) could give 3 points per 1 and 1 point per draw

------------------
2) It would be even nicer if game-specific complex tie-breakers could be implemented for tournaments (like using the goal average in a football championship)

---------------
3) Some situations like a "bye" might require a default score to be given for a game that has not been played. It would be nice if game devs could define their own default scores for the game tournaments.
(To go back to the football tournament, giving a "win" is not enough, you might want to also define the number of goals scored for that game. Or maybe not. I'm talking about the freedom for games to define what is best for them)
-----------------------
4) Some games could define multiple scoring systems.

Some systems would only be available in some type of tournaments (like round robin or swiss) and others could be used for all types.

When creating a tournament, the organizer would be able to pick one of the scoring systems available for that game and type of tournament or, of course, use the BGA default one.

• ゲームアクションを行おうとしたとき、何が起こりましたか?(エラーメッセージ、ステータスバーメッセージ、他)

• あなたのブラウザは何ですか?

• 表示の問題を説明してください もしこのバグのスクリーンショットがあれば(素晴らしい!)、Imgur.com等を使ってアップロードし、リンクをコピー&ペーストしてください。

See boardgamearena.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=37045 for details.

I won't go into the details here because of the impossibility to edit for mistakes and the like...

1) It would be nice if the framework allowed game developers to define tournament scoring system(s) specific to each game. Especially for games that do have a IRL tournament scene or for games that simulate sports that have various types of championships....

As an example, a round-robin tournament of football (soccer) could give 3 points per 1 and 1 point per draw

------------------
2) It would be even nicer if game-specific complex tie-breakers could be implemented for tournaments (like using the goal average in a football championship)

---------------
3) Some situations like a "bye" might require a default score to be given for a game that has not been played. It would be nice if game devs could define their own default scores for the game tournaments.
(To go back to the football tournament, giving a "win" is not enough, you might want to also define the number of goals scored for that game. Or maybe not. I'm talking about the freedom for games to define what is best for them)
-----------------------
4) Some games could define multiple scoring systems.

Some systems would only be available in some type of tournaments (like round robin or swiss) and others could be used for all types.

When creating a tournament, the organizer would be able to pick one of the scoring systems available for that game and type of tournament or, of course, use the BGA default one.

• あなたのブラウザは何ですか?

• あなたの言語の代わりに、表示されている英語の文章をコピー&ペーストしてください。 もしこのバグのスクリーンショットがあれば(素晴らしい!)、Imgur.com等を使ってアップロードし、リンクをコピー&ペーストしてください。

See boardgamearena.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=37045 for details.

I won't go into the details here because of the impossibility to edit for mistakes and the like...

1) It would be nice if the framework allowed game developers to define tournament scoring system(s) specific to each game. Especially for games that do have a IRL tournament scene or for games that simulate sports that have various types of championships....

As an example, a round-robin tournament of football (soccer) could give 3 points per 1 and 1 point per draw

------------------
2) It would be even nicer if game-specific complex tie-breakers could be implemented for tournaments (like using the goal average in a football championship)

---------------
3) Some situations like a "bye" might require a default score to be given for a game that has not been played. It would be nice if game devs could define their own default scores for the game tournaments.
(To go back to the football tournament, giving a "win" is not enough, you might want to also define the number of goals scored for that game. Or maybe not. I'm talking about the freedom for games to define what is best for them)
-----------------------
4) Some games could define multiple scoring systems.

Some systems would only be available in some type of tournaments (like round robin or swiss) and others could be used for all types.

When creating a tournament, the organizer would be able to pick one of the scoring systems available for that game and type of tournament or, of course, use the BGA default one.

• このテキストは翻訳ページで翻訳可能になっていますか?もしそうならば、24時間以上前に翻訳されていますか?

• あなたのブラウザは何ですか?

• 何を意味するのか、簡単に理解できるようにあなたの提案を正確かつ簡潔に説明してください。

See boardgamearena.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=37045 for details.

I won't go into the details here because of the impossibility to edit for mistakes and the like...

1) It would be nice if the framework allowed game developers to define tournament scoring system(s) specific to each game. Especially for games that do have a IRL tournament scene or for games that simulate sports that have various types of championships....

As an example, a round-robin tournament of football (soccer) could give 3 points per 1 and 1 point per draw

------------------
2) It would be even nicer if game-specific complex tie-breakers could be implemented for tournaments (like using the goal average in a football championship)

---------------
3) Some situations like a "bye" might require a default score to be given for a game that has not been played. It would be nice if game devs could define their own default scores for the game tournaments.
(To go back to the football tournament, giving a "win" is not enough, you might want to also define the number of goals scored for that game. Or maybe not. I'm talking about the freedom for games to define what is best for them)
-----------------------
4) Some games could define multiple scoring systems.

Some systems would only be available in some type of tournaments (like round robin or swiss) and others could be used for all types.

When creating a tournament, the organizer would be able to pick one of the scoring systems available for that game and type of tournament or, of course, use the BGA default one.

• あなたのブラウザは何ですか?