全ての報告
テラフォーミング・マーズ(Terraforming Mars)の報告
#108233: "House Rule: game setup option: mandatory two moves or pass (no defering / skip 2nd action)"
rejected: 開発者はそれは良い考えではない、あるいは費用対効果が低すぎると考えています
19
どういった内容ですか?
どうしましたか?以下から選んでください
提案:次項がゲームを大きく改善すると思われる
詳細
-
• 何を意味するのか、簡単に理解できるようにあなたの提案を正確かつ簡潔に説明してください。
whenever I've played in tournaments this rule is in effect. if you can't do 2 moves you've passed for the generation after the first move. it makes games go sooo much faster (especially turn-based).
• あなたのブラウザは何ですか?
Mozilla v5
報告履歴
2023年Dec22日 18:44 • startrekchekov • この提案はまだ開発者によって解析されていません:
it should be implemented as a game setup option (no defer).
2024年Jan26日 5:22 • Karlsen • この提案はまだ開発者によって解析されていません:
It should be (very) optional, as it is against the actual rules of the game.
2024年Feb4日 17:57 • Supergravity • この提案はまだ開発者によって解析されていません:
I agree this would be a nice rule-variance option, but it should not delay going to Beta or full release.
2024年Feb16日 17:38 • Mr_yoso • この提案はまだ開発者によって解析されていません:
I agree that this should only be a (very) optional set up, as intentionally slowing down your moves is a feature of the game's design. some cards actively benefit from slowing your play, like if you get a bonus for played space cards, you may want to slow your play so that other players use their space cards first.
2024年Mar20日 5:53 • bananasplay • この提案はまだ開発者によって解析されていません:
Not a fan of implementing everyone's pet house rules, even if as a table option (because then players have more things to evaluate to ensure that they the table they're considering joining doesn't have any of these implemented). Consider this a downvote on the entire idea.
2024年Mar20日 16:13 • Corwin007 • この提案はまだ開発者によって解析されていません:
I'd pretty much be against this one for the reasons already stated, I'd have to screen games to make sure the option is not on, and since it's not an official option I'd rather not see this implemented.
2024年Mar21日 16:19 • Lumin_S • この提案はまだ開発者によって解析されていません:
I'm a big supporter of this house rule, and it does speed things up nicely without changing very much in the game. That said all house rule options would need publisher approval, so... anyone want to get in touch with the publisher and try to convince them it's a good idea?
2024年Mar25日 23:23 • frotes • この提案はまだ開発者によって解析されていません:
+1 this variant. It can make async play much better and detracts little from the play experience
of course this would be an optional setup choice
of course this would be an optional setup choice
2024年Mar30日 14:46 • Victoria_La • この提案はまだ開発者によって解析されていません:
Report short description
"game setup option: mandatory two moves or pass (no defering / skip 2nd action)"
changed to
"House Rule: game setup option: mandatory two moves or pass (no defering / skip 2nd action)"
"game setup option: mandatory two moves or pass (no defering / skip 2nd action)"
changed to
"House Rule: game setup option: mandatory two moves or pass (no defering / skip 2nd action)"
2024年Apr16日 17:48 • RoyalRook • この提案はまだ開発者によって解析されていません:
+1, especially for turn base games. It can only improve the state of the play.
2024年Apr30日 0:57 • Shiny_Charizard • この提案はまだ開発者によって解析されていません:
I guess as long as there is an option this shouldn't matter, but I will always vote against this.
It takes so much away from the game strategy, so much for no gain.
BGA already has fast turn options for those who feel like the game is too slow without it.
It takes so much away from the game strategy, so much for no gain.
BGA already has fast turn options for those who feel like the game is too slow without it.
2024年Aug7日 17:24 • Yahyra • この提案はまだ開発者によって解析されていません:
I agree with 'downvote' for this. I suggest finding friends /like minded players and agreeing to play in this manner.
2024年Aug17日 6:35 • ArchDevious • この提案はまだ開発者によって解析されていません:
I love this, please. Small reduction in strategy for a huge increase in quality of play, especially for async game
2024年Nov4日 8:39 • perfectgeneral • この提案はまだ開発者によって解析されていません:
This is against the letter and spirit of the rules. Down vote.
2024年Nov21日 9:39 • HelmsDeepSleeper • この提案はまだ開発者によって解析されていません:
Downvote. This is against the game rules
2025年Sep27日 18:46 • FrankJones • 開発者はそれは良い考えではない、あるいは費用対効果が低すぎると考えています:
This is not how Terraform Mars is played.
2025年Sep29日 16:53 • frotes • 開発者はそれは良い考えではない、あるいは費用対効果が低すぎると考えています:
that's a disappointing decision.
I would understand if dev didn't want to put in the work to add the option but to just say it isn't part of the game as the reason.. well it's suggested as a variant. One that has been used in even tournaments before
Having an option choice also does not impact any players that want to play the game with rules as written.
I would understand if dev didn't want to put in the work to add the option but to just say it isn't part of the game as the reason.. well it's suggested as a variant. One that has been used in even tournaments before
Having an option choice also does not impact any players that want to play the game with rules as written.
2025年Oct2日 2:29 • happy-smile • 開発者はそれは良い考えではない、あるいは費用対効果が低すぎると考えています:
I guess it depends what is official stand of BGA towards the houserules. I heard that they don't implement them unless confirmed directly with designers/publishers. Not sure if that is true.
2025年Oct2日 3:16 • FrankJones • 開発者はそれは良い考えではない、あるいは費用対効果が低すぎると考えています:
It's true. And, this is a terrible house rule.
It is rejected. The game allows players do 1 or 2 actions. It's absurd nonsense that people want to force everyone to take 2 actions.
End of discussion.
It is rejected. The game allows players do 1 or 2 actions. It's absurd nonsense that people want to force everyone to take 2 actions.
End of discussion.
報告に書き加える
このバグを再現するため、またはあなたの提案を理解するために、ここに関連性があると思われるものを追加してください:
- 他のテーブルID/行動ID
- F5キー(ページの再読込)で問題は解決されましたか?
- 問題は何回も起こりましたか?毎回 起こりますか?ランダムに起きますか?
- もしこのバグのスクリーンショットがあれば(素晴らしい!)、Imgur.com等を使ってアップロードし、リンクをコピー&ペーストしてください。
